Current Proteomics
ISSN: 1570-1646
Current Proteomics
Volume 4 Number 4, December 2007
Contents

Possibilities of Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis
in the Understanding of Human Disease Pp.
187-197
J. Bermúdez-Crespo and J.L. López
[Abstract]
The “Invisible Proteome”: How to Capture
the Low Abundance Proteins Via Combinatorial Ligand Libraries
Pp. 198-208
E. Boschetti, B. Monsarrat and P.G. Righetti
[Abstract]
Neuroproteomics and the Detection of Regulatory Phosphosites
Pp. 209-222
R.Y. Tweedie-Cullen, B. Wollscheid, M. Livingstone-Zatchej
and I.M. Mansuy
[Abstract]
Computational Methods and Algorithms for Mass Spectrometry
Based Differential Proteomics Pp. 223-234
S. Mavroudi, S. Papadimitriou, S. Kossida, S.D. Likothanassis
and A. Vlahou
[Abstract]
Relevance of Protein Isoforms in Proteomic Studies
Pp. 235-252
A.M. Rodríguez-Piñeiro, P. Álvarez-Chaver,
V.S. Martínez Zorzano, F.J. Rodríguez-Berrocal
and M.P. de la Cadena
[Abstract]
Abstracts

[Back to top]
Possibilities of Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis in the
Understanding of Human Disease
J. Bermúdez-Crespo and J.L. López
Because of the multifactorial nature of many diseases,
two-dimensional electrophoresis is a basic proteomics tool
for its ability of simultaneously detecting post-and co-translational
modifications, which cannot be predicted from genome sequences.
This review describes the central role of proteomics tool,
two-dimensional electrophoresis for clinical biomarker discovery,
the identification of prognostic and diagnostic markers, their
use in monitoring the effects of drug treatments and eventually
finding more efficient and safer therapeutics for a wide range
of pathologies.
[Back to top]
The “Invisible Proteome”: How to Capture
the Low Abundance Proteins Via Combinatorial Ligand Libraries
E. Boschetti, B. Monsarrat and P.G. Righetti
Despite recent advances in pre-fractionation procedures
and depletion methods via immuno-subtraction protocols
of the most abundant species, the “low-abundance”
proteome remains largely undetected. We report here a novel
technology, called ProteoMiner, for bringing to the limelight
this vast pool of low-abundance species, which could constitute
>50% of any proteome in any living organism. It consists
of a combinatorial ligand library, composed of millions of
diverse hexapeptide baits, able to capture and concentrate
the “low-abundance” proteome, while drastically
cutting the concentration of the most abundant compounds.
Since no depletion of any species is contemplated by this
methodology, but a drastic reduction of the sample dynamic
range, the noxious phenomenon of co-depletion (especially
troublesome in affinity depletion methods) does not occur.
In addition to previously reported data on analysis of human
sera and urines, we describe here novel applications for the
detection of the low-abundance proteome in human blood cells,
such as the red blood cells (RBC) and platelets and in biological
fluids, such as cerebrospinal fluid. In particular, in the
case of RBC, where hemoglobin alone constitutes ca.
98% of the total cytoplasmic proteome, the ProteoMiner technology
allowed the detection of >1500 proteins in the remaining
2% low-abundance cytoplasmic proteome, most of them not previously
reported even in the most advanced investigations. The merits
and limits of ProteMiner are discussed and evaluated.
[Back to top]
Neuroproteomics and the Detection of Regulatory Phosphosites
R.Y. Tweedie-Cullen, B. Wollscheid, M. Livingstone-Zatchej
and I.M. Mansuy
Protein phosphorylation is a key post-translational modification
that controls intracellular signalling in virtually all cell
types. In the nervous system, it contributes to the regulation
of neuronal signalling and control processes underlying synaptic
plasticity and cognitive functions. However, despite its importance,
knowledge about phosphoproteins and their phosphosites in
the brain remains limited. A pre-requisite for unravelling
brain biology and function at the molecular level, are the
qualitative and quantitative analyses of protein phosphorylation
and its dynamics. These analyses of the phosphoproteome require
novel methodologies in addition to traditional biochemical
methods. Current phosphoproteomic workflows have reached a
level of maturity, which allow for their use in combination
with molecular approaches, and their application to the study
of higher order brain function and cognitive processes. Neuroproteomics
is emerging as an essential new sub-field of the neurosciences.
This review focuses on the recent advances in the application
of neuroproteomics to the phosphoproteome and discusses the
challenges to come.
[Back to top]
Computational Methods and Algorithms for Mass Spectrometry
Based Differential Proteomics
S. Mavroudi, S. Papadimitriou, S. Kossida, S.D. Likothanassis
and A. Vlahou
As most high-throughput data, mass spec proteomics data
are complex, noisy and incomplete. Additionally, in settings
addressing questions about differential expression of proteins
the data are usually represented by relatively few samples
and a very large number of predictor variables, i.e., m/z
peaks. These characteristics pose a significant challenge
for most analysis methods. In addition, the preprocessing
of the data remains an active research area having a great
impact on the subsequent analysis steps.
A wide range of algorithms have been proposed for both the
pre-processing and the higher leve l analysis of proteomics
data. They range from classical approaches to second generation
algorithms, which aim at tackling some of the limitations
of earlier methods. Many of the proposed algorithms have been
reported to produce encouraging results. However, no single
algorithm has emerged as a method of choice.
This work provides a critical review of the recent approaches
for pre-processing and higher level analysis of proteomics
data. Also their strengths and limitations are evaluated.
Emphasis is given on describing the most common and serious
mistakes recorded in published differential proteomics studies.
Moreover, the review provides guidance for choosing and correctly
applying the appropriate algorithms according to our experience.
Also hints for the design of novel algorithms, which will
more effectively handle the specific characteristics and constrains
of differential proteomics data are discussed.
[Back to top]
Relevance of Protein Isoforms in Proteomic
Studies
A.M. Rodríguez-Piñeiro, P. Álvarez-Chaver,
V.S. Martínez Zorzano, F.J. Rodríguez-Berrocal
and M.P. de la Cadena
The development of proteomics has generated considerable
interest in the search of new biomarkers since proteins reflect
biological conditions more directly than nucleic acids. However,
despite the large number of laboratories reporting exciting
and successful studies within this frame, we have not witnessed
its clinical application yet. One of the reasons for this
failure is the difficult validation of the results extracted
from differential protein expression studies, mainly because
the numerous pre- and post-translational events lead to the
appearance of the so-called isoforms, which the immunochemical
methods employed fail to distinguish due to a lack of isoform-specific
antibodies.
Though the term “isoform” does not exist as such
according to the IUPAC, with the development of proteomics
this de-nomination is used to refer to various forms of a
protein which charge or mass properties produce different
mobility in two-dimensional gels, irrespectively of their
genetic origin. In this review, we address this issue and
consider the different definitions of “isoforms”;
we also explain the origins of the protein diversity, from
the early mechanisms of RNA editing and alternative splicing
to the different types of post-translational modifications.
From the research point of view, we address the utility of
the proteomic methods that allow isoform detection and distinction,
as well as the issue of isoform annotation in databases. From
an applied point of view, we consider the problem isoforms
involve in the clinical practice, together with their relevance
in the disease biomarker field and their role during validation.
Lastly, we provide some examples of well-known proteins for
which isoforms have been reported in literature.
|