|
Current
Pharmaceutical Design
ISSN: 1381-6128

Current Pharmaceutical Design
Volume 11, Number 32, 2005
Contents
Biochemical and Clinical Relevance of Hyperuricaemia
Executive Editor: Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Associate Editor: Stella S. Daskalopoulou

Editorial Pp.4115
Overview of Hyperuricaemia and Gout Pp.4117
D. Masseoud, K. Rott, R. Liu-Bryan and C. Agudelo
[Abstract]
Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Pp.4125
S.G. Wannamethee
[Abstract]
Dietary Factors and Hyperuricaemia Pp.4133
N. Schlesinger
[Abstract]
Uric Acid and Hypertension Pp.4139
M. Schachter
[Abstract]
Uric Acid and Oxidative Stress Pp.4145
G.K. Glantzounis, E.C. Tsimoyiannis, A.M. Kappas and D.A.
Galaris
[Abstract]
Uric Acid and the Kidney: Urate Transport, Stone Disease
and Progressive Renal Failure Pp.4153
G. Capasso, Ph. Jaeger, W.G. Robertson and R.J. Unwin
[Abstract]
Effect on Serum Uric Acid Levels of Drugs Prescribed
for Indications other than Treating Hyperuricaemia Pp.4161
S.S. Daskalopoulou, V. Tzovaras, D.P. Mikhailidis and
M. Elisaf
[Abstract]
Rasburicase: A New Approach for Preventing and/or
Treating Tumor Lysis Syndrome Pp.4177
O. Bessmertny, L.M. Robitaille and M.S. Cairo
[Abstract]
General Articles
Raloxifene and Cardiovascular Health: Its Relationship
to Lipid and Glucose Metabolism, Hemostatic and Inflammation
Factors and Cardiovascular Function in Postmenopausal Women
Pp.4187
C.M. Francucci, A. Camilletti and M. Boscaro
[Abstract]
Recent Advances in the Discovery of Tissue Factor/Factor
VIIa Inhibitors and Dual Inhibitors of Factor VIIa/Factor
Xa Pp.4207
A. Kranjc, D. Kikelj and L. Peterlin-Masic
[Abstract]
Lifelong Endocrine Fluctuations and Related Cognitive Disorders
Pp.4229
M.L. Ancelin and K. Ritchie
[Abstract]
Abstracts
[Back to top]
Editorial
Biochemical and Clinical Relevance of Hyperuricaemia
Hyperuricaemia is a common ‘metabolic disorder’
with several biochemical and clinical implications. Although
hyperuricaemia is often asymptomatic, it can be associated
with gout, renal calculi and impaired renal function. There
is also evidence that elevated serum urate levels may predict
an increased risk of vascular events. These topics are considered
in this issue of the journal. In addition, current and future
treatment options are discussed.
This issue of Current Pharmaceutical Design is dedicated
to hyperuricaemia and its treatment. This is a common ‘metabolic
disorder’, especially in men. Hyperuricaemia is often
asymptomatic, but it can be associated with gout (a common
arthropathy), renal calculi and impaired renal function. There
is also evidence that elevated serum urate levels may predict
an increased risk of vascular events.
Masseoud et al. provide an overview of hyperuricaemia
and gout that sets the pace for the whole issue [1]. These
authors expertly consider the current treatment of acute gout.
Future treatment options, in part guided by a better understanding
of pathophysiology, are also discussed.
Wannamethee comprehensively discusses the link between raised
circulating urate levels and vascular disease in the general
population, among hypertensives and those with coronary heart
disease (CHD), stroke, diabetes and heart failure [2]. It
is proposed that the influence of urate on CHD is explained
by the secondary association with other established risk factors
(e.g. hypertension, dyslipidaemia, hyperinsulinaemia, obesity
and pre-existing disease). Furthermore, there is evidence
that insulin resistance is partially responsible for the hyperuricaemia
seen in many patients with the metabolic syndrome, a condition
associated with an increased vascular risk [2-5]. All these
factors are likely to confound the relationship between urate
and vascular risk [2]. Therefore, it is not yet clear whether
urate plays a causative role or if it is just a ‘marker’
of vascular risk. Nevertheless, urate may provide useful prognostic
information in subjects with hypertension and vascular disease
[2].
What is needed is to assess, in specifically designed interventional
trials, whether pharmacologically lowering circulating urate
levels results in a reduction in vascular events. Such trials
would probably be restricted to patients with established
CHD so as to allow for an increased event rate. One problem
would be similar to that seen in lipid lowering and hypertension
trials – i.e. ‘how low should we go?’. It
is possible that lower is not necessarily better, as outlined
by Glantzounis et al. in this issue [6]. In fact,
at the molecular level there is evidence to support both a
causative and protective (e.g. antioxidant) role for urate
[1, 5-7].
The link between hyperuricaemia and hypertension is particularly
interesting since it is common and possibly aggravated (or
improved) by antihypertensive agents (reviewed by Schachter
in this issue) [5, 8]. This topic recently received attention
because in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction
in hypertension (LIFE) trial, 29% of the benefit from treatment
with losartan, when compared with atenolol, was attributed
to a fall in serum urate levels [9]. Along these lines, it
is of interest that in another study the benefit from diuretic
treatment was restricted to the patients who did not show
a marked increase in serum urate levels [10].
Renal impairment and CHD may progress in parallel. Therefore,
it is of interest that in the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease
Evaluation (GREACE) study we found that aggressive cholesterol
lowering with atorvastatin was associated with a fall in both
serum creatinine and urate [11, 12]. A statin-associated beneficial
effect on renal function was also seen in the much larger
Heart Protection Study (HPS) [13].
Renal calculi and impaired renal function may occur in hyperuricaemic
patients. This topic is expertly reviewed by Capasso et
al. [7]. The novel and as yet unexplained link between
hyperuricaemia and the urinary glycoprotein Tamm-Horsfall
protein (uromodulin) is also discussed.
Although many patients with elevated urate levels need pharmacological
intervention, we must not forget the role of diet (reviewed
by Schlesinger in this issue) [4]. Worldwide studies suggest
that the incidence of hyperuricaemia and gout may be increasing,
probably because of physical inactivity and dietary changes
[4]. Controlled weight management, moderation in the consumption
of alcohol and “low purine” diets are some of
the suggested non-pharmacological beneficial measures [4].
Several drugs can lower circulating urate levels (reviewed
by Daskalopoulou et al. in this issue) [8]. This
‘beneficial’ additional effect is relevant since
the risk of acute gout varies considerably within a relatively
narrow range of urate levels [8]. Such ‘small’
changes may also influence vascular risk. A careful selection
of drugs prescribed for other reasons will maximise their
beneficial effect in terms of lowering urate levels. This
approach could avoid polypharmacy, decrease the occurrence
of drug interactions and also improve compliance [8].
Although allopurinol is widely used to treat hyperuricaemia,
there is a need for other options to accommodate those who
cannot tolerate allopurinol. Patients in special circumstances
(e.g. those at a high risk of developing tumour lysis syndrome)
may also benefit from a rapid and extensive hypouricaemic
effect [1, 14]. Several drugs are being developed to fulfil
these needs. Among them, rasburicase (a recombinant urate
oxidase) is already available in several countries (see review
by Bessmertny et al. in this issue) [14].
Hyperuricaemia deserves attention not only because it is
a common problem but also because the consequences can impact
on several organs (joints, kidneys and the vasculature).
References
[1] Masseoud D, Rott K, Liu-Bryan R, Agudelo C. Overview
of Hyperuricaemia and Gout. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32):
4117-4124.
[2] Wannamethee SG. Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Coronary
Heart Disease. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32): 4125-4132.
[3] Daskalopoulou SS, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf M. Prevention
and treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Angiology 2004; 55:
589-612.
[4] Schlesinger N. Dietary Factors and Hyperuricaemia. Curr
Pharm Design 2005; 11(32): 4133-4138.
[5] Schachter M. Uric acid, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32): 4139-4143.
[6] Glantzounis GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Kappas AM, Galaris DA.
Uric Acid and Oxidative Stress. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32):
4145-4151.
[7] Capasso G, Jaeger Ph, Robertson WG, Unwin RJ. Uric Acid
and the Kidney: Urate Transport, Stone Disease and Progressive
Renal Failure. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32): 4153-4159.
[8] Daskalopoulou SS, Tzovaras V, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf
M. Effect on serum uric acid levels of drugs prescribed for
indications other than treating hyperuricaemia. Curr Pharm
Design 2005; 11(32): 4161-4175.
[9] Hoieggen A, Alderman MH, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Devereux
RB, De Faire U, et al. LIFE Study Group. The impact
of serum uric acid on cardiovascular outcomes in the LIFE
study. Kidney Int 2004; 65: 1041-9.
[10] Franse LV, Pahor M, Bari M, Shorr RI, Wan JY, Somes
GW, et al. Serum uric acid, diuretic treatment and
risk of cardiovascular events in the systolic hypertension
in the Elderly Program (SHEP). J Hypertens 2000; 18: 1149-54.
[11] Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, Symeonidis
AN, Pehlivanidis AN, Bouloukos VI, et al. for the
GREACE Collaborative Group. The effect of statins versus untreated
dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary
heart disease. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 728-34.
[12] Athyros VG, Elisaf M, Papageorgiou AA, Symeonidis AN,
Pehlivanidis AN, Bouloukos VI, et al. for the GREACE
Collaborative Group. Effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidemia
on serum uric acid levels in patients with coronary heart
disease. A subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and
Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study. Am J Kidney
Dis 2004; 43: 589-99.
[13] MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering
with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomized
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 2005-16
[14] Bessmertny O, Robitaille LM, Cairo MS. Rasburicase:
a New Approach for Preventing and/or Treating Tumor Lysis
Syndrome. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(32): 4177-4185.
S.S. Daskalopoulou MSc DIC MD FASA
D.P. Mikhailidis MD FASA FFPM FRCPath FRCP
Department Clinical Biochemistry
(Vascular Disease Prevention Clinics)
Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free and
University College Medical School
(University of London), Pond Street
London NW3 2QG, UK
[Back to top]
Overview of Hyperuricaemia and Gout
D. Masseoud, K. Rott, R. Liu-Bryan and C. Agudelo
in most mammals purine degradation ultimately leads to the
formation of allantoin. Humans lack the enzyme uricase, which
catalyzes the conversion of uric acid to allantoin. The resulting
higher level of uric acid has been hypothesized to play a
role as an antioxidant. Hyperuricaemia is usually an asymptomatic
condition which is hypothesized to play a role in cardiovascular
disease and hypertension. Some hyperuricaemic individuals
develop gout, an inflammatory arthritis caused by the deposition
of monosodium urate crystals in joints. Over time, acute intermittent
gouty arthritis can develop into a chronic condition with
deposits of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints and
as tophi. The mechanisms by which MSU crystals lead to an
acute inflammatory arthritis are under investigation and current
knowledge is reviewed here. Treatment of gout includes management
of acute flares with anti-inflammatory medications such as
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids and
long term management with urate-lowering therapy when indicated.
Future directions in the treatment of gout, in part guided
by a better understanding of pathophysiology, are discussed.
[Back to top]
Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
S.G. Wannamethee
Many large epidemiological studies confirmed a positive
association between raised serum uric acid (SUA) levels and
risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) or cardiovascular disease
(CVD) in the general population, among hypertensive patients
and those with established CHD, stroke, diabetes and heart
failure. There is much controversy concerning the role of
SUA as an independent risk factor for CHD as SUA is related
to many of the established risk factors for cardiovascular
disease including hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity and
pre-existing disease. The epidemiological evidence suggests
that SUA is an independent predictor of CVD in subjects with
hypertension and established vascular disease but not in healthy
subjects. This evidence suggests that the influence of SUA
on CHD is explained by the secondary association of SUA with
other established etiological risk factors (hypertension,
dyslipidaemia, hyperinsulinaemia, obesity and pre-existing
disease). There is no evidence so far to indicate that lowering
SUA levels with drug treatment has a beneficial effect on
CVD outcome.
In summary, there is little support for an independent causal
role for SUA in the development of CHD. However, SUA may provide
useful prognostic information in subjects with hypertension
and vascular disease.
[Back to top]
Dietary Factors and Hyperuricaemia
N. Schlesinger
The connection of gout and hyperuricaemia with gluttony,
overindulgence in food and alcohol and obesity dates from
ancient times. Studies from different parts of the world suggest
that the incidence and severity of hyperuricaemia and gout
may be increasing.
Uric acid (urate) is the end product of purine degradation.
Although most uric acid is derived from the metabolism of
endogenous purine, eating foods rich in purines contributes
to the total pool of uric acid.
Sustained hyperuricaemia is a risk factor for acute gouty
arthritis, chronic tophaceous gout, renal stones and possibly
cardiovascular events and mortality. Before starting lifelong
urate-lowering drug therapy, it is important to identify and
treat underlying disorders that may be contributing to hyperuricaemia.
It is relevant to recognize the strong association of the
insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) (abdominal obesity, dyslipidaemia,
hypertension, raised serum insulin levels and glucose intolerance)
with hyperuricaemia.
Consumption of meat, seafood and alcoholic beverages in moderation
and attention to food portion size is important. Moderation
in the consumption of not only beer but also other forms of
alcohol is essential. In the obese, controlled weight management
has the potential to lower serum urate in a quantitatively
similar way to relatively unpalatable "low purine"
diets. Non-fat milk and low-fat yogurt have a variety of health
benefits and dairy products may have clinically meaningful
antihyperuricaemic effects. In addition, fruits, such as cherries
and high intakes of vegetable protein diet may reduce serum
urate levels.
[Back to top]
Uric Acid and Hypertension
M. Schachter
Increased levels of uric acid are associated with cardiovascular
disease and the metabolic syndrome. They may predict clinical
outcomes and also the onset of hypertension, though it is
less clear that hyperuricaemia can be regarded as an independent
risk factor given its clustering with other well-recognised
factors. Uric acid may increase as a result of pathophysiological
processes such as impaired renal sodium handling but may also
contribute to renal and vascular damage, particularly endothelial
dysfunction. It is notable that the synthesis of uric acid
may be associated with the generation of reactive oxygen species
if the enzyme xanthine oxidorectase is converted to the oxidase,
as may occur in ischaemia. It has been suggested that uric
acid may play a role in the pathogenesis of early-onset hypertension
but evidence for this is limited. There is also very limited
data to suggest that in some circumstances lowering uric acid
can lower blood pressure. In the metabolic syndrome, the presence
of elevated uric acid concentrations is closely associated
with raised triglyceride levels, for reasons that have not
been clearly defined. It remains to be seen whether uric acid
could or should be considered a specific therapeutic target
in cardiovascular disease and especially in hypertension and
if so what should be the optimal pharmacological approach
to lowering serum urate levels.
[Back to top]
Uric Acid and Oxidative Stress
G.K. Glantzounis, E.C. Tsimoyiannis, A.M. Kappas and D.A.
Galaris
Uric acid is the final product of purine metabolism in humans.
The final two reactions of its production catalyzing the conversion
of hypoxanthine to xanthine and the latter to uric acid are
catalysed by the enzyme xanthine oxidoreductase, which may
attain two inter-convertible forms, namely xanthine dehydrogenase
or xanthine oxidase. The latter uses molecular oxygen as electron
acceptor and generates superoxide anion and other reactive
oxygen products. The role of uric acid in conditions associated
with oxidative stress is not entirely clear. Evidence mainly
based on epidemiological studies suggests that increased serum
levels of uric acid are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease
where oxidative stress plays an important pathophysiological
role. Also, allopurinol, a xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor
that lowers serum levels of uric acid exerts protective effects
in situations associated with oxidative stress (e.g. ischaemia-reperfusion
injury, cardiovascular disease). However, there is increasing
experimental and clinical evidence showing that uric acid
has an important role in vivo as an antioxidant.
This review presents the current evidence regarding the antioxidant
role of uric acid and suggests that it has an important role
as an oxidative stress marker and a potential therapeutic
role as an antioxidant. Further well designed clinical studies
are needed to clarify the potential use of uric acid (or uric
acid precursors) in diseases associated with oxidative stress.
[Back to top]
Uric Acid and the Kidney: Urate Transport, Stone Disease
and Progressive Renal Failure
G. Capasso, Ph. Jaeger, W.G. Robertson and R.J. Unwin
In this brief review and update, we try to cover recent
developments in our understanding of uric acid transport by
the kidney, the contribution of uric acid to renal stone disease,
its potential role in progressive renal failure and, most
recently, the novel and as yet unexplained link between the
urinary glycoprotein Tamm-Horsfall protein (uromodulin) and
hyperuricaemia and two inherited forms of renal disease with
chronic renal failure.
[Back to top]
Effect on Serum Uric Acid Levels of Drugs Prescribed
for Indications other than Treating Hyperuricaemia
S.S. Daskalopoulou, V. Tzovaras, D.P. Mikhailidis and
M. Elisaf
Beyond allopurinol and the well-established uricosuric drugs,
several other agents can decrease serum uric acid (SUA) levels,
such as losartan, fenofibrate and some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs). Some of these drugs increase renal urate excretion.
Hyperuricaemia and gout are common problems (at least 1%
of Western men are affected by gout). Raised SUA levels increase
the incidence of acute gout and renal calculi. Hyperuricaemia
may also predict an increased risk of vascular events. Therefore,
lowering SUA levels is of clinical relevance.
In this review we consider the effect on SUA levels of drugs
that are prescribed for indications other than treating hyperuricaemia.
These drugs may obviate the need for specific treatment (e.g.
allopurinol) aimed at lowering SUA levels. Furthermore, because
hyperuricaemic patients may already be on several drugs (e.g.
due to associated dyslipidaemia, hypertension and/or arthritis)
compliance may be improved by avoiding additional medication.
The potential for adverse effects associated with polypharmacy
would also be decreased.
[Back to top]
Rasburicase: A New Approach for Preventing and/or
Treating Tumor Lysis Syndrome
O. Bessmertny, L.M. Robitaille and M.S. Cairo
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency requiring
prompt attention to the management of potentially life-threatening
metabolic derangements. Hyperuricaemia is one of the prominent
features of TLS which, if not adequately prevented or treated,
may lead to renal failure, requiring dialysis. Conventional
management of hyperuricaemia involved the use of aggressive
hydration, urinary alkalinization and allopurinol. Despite
these measures, as many as 14.1% of high-risk patients may
still develop renal failure. With the advent of newer agents
such as rasburicase, the paradigm of TLS management has shifted
towards risk stratification and the use of rasburicase in
conjunction with hydration in patients at high risk for TLS.
The advantage of rasburicase over allopurinol is its rapid
onset of action, lack of need for urine alkalinization, which
may worsen hyperphosphataemia and a satisfactory safety profile.
Overall, rasburicase offers a safe and more effective alternative
to allopurinol in patients at highest risk for TLS. Some of
the unanswered questions requiring further investigation with
regard to rasburicase use include the optimal number of doses
needed, optimal dose based on uric acid levels and tumor burden,
dosing in obese patients and maximum dose.
General Articles
[Back to top]
Raloxifene and Cardiovascular Health: Its Relationship
to Lipid and Glucose Metabolism, Hemostatic and Inflammation
Factors and Cardiovascular Function in Postmenopausal Women
C.M. Francucci, A. Camilletti and M. Boscaro
CHD is one of the most common serious chronic conditions
in postmenopausal women and leads to extremely high risk for
recurrent myocardial infarction and death. On the basis of
the currently available randomized clinical-trial results
the role of conventional HRT for treatment and prevention
of CHD is rapidly evolving from presumed benefit to proven
harm, at least in some categories of women yet to define.
For this reason there has been a particular interest in potential
clinical uses of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs).
SERMs are a class of compounds that can act as estrogen
receptor (ER) agonists in some domains (bone and lipids) and
acting as ER antagonists in others (breast and uterus). Raloxifene
hydrochloride is an antiestrogen that is currently approved
only to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Because
of its effects on lipids and other biomarkers of cardiovascular
risk, there is great interest in determining whether it may
benefit the cardiovascular system. The great major-ity of
data on cardiovascular effects of raloxifene concern effects
on lipids and markers of thrombosis and inflammation.
The purpose of this review is to summarize the best available
evidence concerning raloxifene and cardiovascular disease
focusing some areas known to be important risk factors for
cardiovascular diseases: lipids and lipoproteins, glucose
metabolism, hemostatic factors, markers of inflammation and
cardiovascular function.
[Back to top]
Recent Advances in the Discovery of Tissue Factor/Factor
VIIa Inhibitors and Dual Inhibitors of Factor VIIa/Factor
Xa
A. Kranjc, D. Kikelj and L. Peterlin-Masic
The search for an ideal anticoagulant has spanned decades
and has taken several approaches to the identification of
novel target molecules for preventing and treating thrombosis.
In the group of anticoagulants acting through direct inhibition
of coagulation factors, most research has focused on thrombin
and factor Xa inhibitors. Attention has been drawn most recently
to factor VIIa as a promising anticoagulation target, because
of its role in complex with tissue factor, in initiating the
coagulation cascade following blood vessel damage. Several
reports suggest that inhibitors of the tissue factor/factor
VIIa complex prevent thrombosis with a lower bleeding risk
than other types of inhibitors. Accordingly, there is increasing
interest in the generation of potent and selective small-molecule
factor VIIa inhibitors that can be safely administered once
or twice daily in an oral formulation with no need for routine
coagulation monitoring.
The emphasis of this review will be placed on recent advances
in the development of the small-molecule inhibitors of factor
VIIa complexed with tissue factor. The role of factor VIIa
and tissue factor as initiators of the coagulation cascade
following blood vessel damage is described, along with the
structure of the active site of factor VIIa.
[Back to top]
Lifelong Endocrine Fluctuations and Related Cognitive Disorders
M.L. Ancelin and K. Ritchie
The aim of this review is to examine the relationship between
endocrine fluctuation and cognitive functioning. A plethora
of in vitro and in vivo studies has demonstrated
the neuroprotective role of estrogens and their impact on
the neurotransmitter systems implicated in cognition. Recent
hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) trials in non-demented
post-menopausal women suggest a temporary positive effect
(notably on verbal memory), and four recent meta-analyses
converge to suggest a possible protective effect in relation
to Alzheimer’s disease (reducing risk by 29 to 44%).
However, data from the only large randomised controlled trial
published to date, the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study,
did not confirm these observations and have even suggested
an increase in dementia risk for women using HRT compared
to controls. Several methodological differences between observation
studies and controlled trials with regard to patient group,
type, timing and duration of HRT, cognitive measures and analyses,
are discussed to explain these discrepancies. The association
between hormonal serum level and cognitive functioning remains
controversial suggesting high inter-individual vulnerability
in risk. Moreover, research on the impact of endocrine functioning
on cognition during the female reproductive cycle suggests
life-long fluctuations in vulnerability. Etiological models
taking into account the interaction of clinical, reproductive,
and menstrual events throughout life may provide a more valid
approach in understanding the effects of steroids on the brain
and in determining sub-groups at heightened risk. Cognitive
disorders in the elderly are more likely be related to cumulated
lifelong exposure to steroids, rather than to a specific exposure
to a given steroid. Multifactorial models based on an exhaustive
view of all hormonal events throughout reproductive life together
with other risk factors (notably genetic risk factors related
to estrogen receptor polymorphisms) should be explored to
clarify the role of hormonal risk factors, or protective factors
for cognitive dysfunction and dementia.
|