|
Current
Pharmaceutical Design
ISSN: 1381-6128

Current Pharmaceutical Design
Volume 14, Number 11, 2008
Contents
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Executive Editor: Elke Bergmann-Leitner

Editorial Pp.1048
Arginine Deprivation as a Targeted Therapy for Cancer
Pp. 1049-1057
L. Feun, M. You, C.J. Wu, M.T. Kuo, M. Wangpaichitr, S.
Spector and N. Savaraj
[Abstract]
Molecular Targeting Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma:
Present Strategies and Future Perspectives Pp. 1058-1077
S.K. Bjelogrlic, S. Radulovic and N. Babovic
[Abstract]
Design, Synthesis and Development of Novel Camptothecin
Drugs Pp. 1078-1097
S.T. Liew and L-X. Yang
[Abstract]
Combinatorial Application of Nucleic Acid-Based Agents
Targeting Protein Kinases for Cancer Treatment Pp.
1098-1112
B. Spänkuch and K. Strebhardt
[Abstract]
Chemosensitization of Cancer by Nitric Oxide
Pp. 1113-1123
R. Sullivan and C.H. Graham
[Abstract]
Novel Approaches to Deliver Gemcitabine to Cancers
Pp. 1124-1137
L.H. Reddy and P. Couvreur
[Abstract]
Locked Nucleic Acid Holds Promise in the Treatment
of Cancer Pp. 1138-1142
M. Frieden and H. Ørum
[Abstract]
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR): A Novel
Target for Cancer Therapy Pp. 1143-1150
J. Stankova, A.K. Lawrance and R. Rozen
[Abstract]
Abstracts

[Back to top]
Editorial: Anti-Cancer Drugs
Intensive research to design chemotherapeutic therapies of
cancer has been conducted for the last 70 years. Throughout
the decades several groundbreaking observations have been
made and countless compounds have been tested for their anti-neoplastic
activities. Today we have arrived at a point where we understand
in much greater detail the cell biology of tumor cells and
are aiming at very specific cellular and nuclear targets.
This will lead to much lower toxicities and potentially to
wider clinical responses. Moreover, combination therapies
combining chemotherapeutic and either radio- or immunotherapy
might mark a new milestone in the fight against cancer.
The present issue of Anti-Cancer Drugs focuses on novel molecular
approaches to cancer treatment and on studies aiding our understanding
of the molecular events causing cancer or failure of treatment.
As we learn more about the molecular changes in tumor cells
and potential escape mechanisms such knowledge will assist
in the design of efficacious cancer therapies for a large
patient population.
S. Bjelogrlic et al. [1] summarize various approaches
of molecular targeting to interfere or modulate protein activity
or signal transduction in renal cell carcinoma cells. These
efforts may lead to reversal of disease mechanism(s).
M. Frieden et al. [2] review the novel approach of
locked nucleic acids (LNA) for targeting and inhibiting cancer-associated
mRNAs. This novel third generation antisense treatment has
been shown to be safe and effective and is currently under
clinical evaluation.
Exploiting deficiencies in tumor cells at the metabolic level
are novel anti-cancer strategies reviewed by L. Feun et
al. [3]. The authors report on the advances in regards
to targeting tumor cells that lack a key enzyme (argininosuccinate
synthetase (ASS)). Depriving ASS-deficient cancer cells (e.g.,
melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cancer) of arginine
by treatment with an agent such as pegylated arginine deiminase
(ADI-PEG) has been shown in Phase I and II clinical trials
to exhibit anti-cancer effects.
J. Stankova et al. [4] summarize the critical role
of folate and methionine metabolism in cancer cells and the
targeting in anti-neoplastic therapies. The authors also review
their work encompassing the metabolic target methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase and the in vitro and in vivo successes
in reducing tumor growth. Similarly, B. Spaenkuch et al.
[5] report on the attempt to silence cancer-related genes
by antisense oligonucleotides or small interfering RNAs. Such
approaches not only target genes that are crucial for the
function of tumor cells, but also genes that confer protection
by drug-resistance.
A different approach to modulating chemoresistance of tumor
cells is reviewed by R. Sullivan et al. [6]. The
authors assess the adjuvant effect of nitric oxide and nitric
oxide mimetic agents for chemotherapy as such treatment frequently
restores a chemosensitive phenotype. The mode of action is
still under investigation and may be partly caused by increased
blood supply, tumor oxygenation, antioxidant effects as well
as the downregulation of many cellular enzymes and proteins
involved in chemoresistance.
Lastly, new strategies revolving around two widely used chemotherapeutic
drugs are described: L. Reddy et al. [7] describe
new delivery strategies of gemcitabine, a nucleoside analog
that will be incorporated by proliferating cells into newly
synthesized DNA in place of cytidine and leads to the induction
of apoptosis in these cells. T. Liew and L.-X. Yang [8] summarize
the efforts of the pharmaceutical field for the design and
development of DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors such as camptothecin
and its derivatives.
I would like to thank all the authors for their efforts in
reviewing their own research data and the encompassing body
of literature in order to make this issue a comprehensive
overview of current efforts to identify and target molecular
pathways as well as to discover efficacious novel anti-cancer
drugs.
References
[1] Bjelogrlic SK, Radulovic S, Babovic N. Molecular targeting
agents in renal cell carcinoma: present strategies and future
perspectives. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1049-1057.
[2] Frieden M, Henrik Ø. Locked Nucleic Acid holds
promise in the treatment of cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11):
1058-1077.
[3] Feun L, You M, Wu CJ, Kuo MT, Wangpaichitr M, Spector
S, Savaraj N. Arginine deprivation as a targeted therapy for
cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1078-1097.
[4] Stankova J, Lawrance AK, and Rozen R. Methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase (MTHFR): a novel target for cancer therapy. Curr
Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1098-1112.
[5] Spänkuch B, Strebhardt K. Combinatorial application
of nucleic acid-based agents targeting protein kinases for
cancer treatment. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1113-1123.
[6] Sullivan R, Graham CH. Chemosensitization of cancer by
nitric oxide. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1124-1137.
[7] Reddy LH, Couvreur P. Novel approaches to deliver gemcitabine
to cancers. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1138-1142.
[8] Liew ST, Yang L-X. Design, Synthesis and development of
novel camptothecin drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14(11): 1143-1151.
Elke Bergmann-Leitner
Department of Medicine
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Bethesda, MD 20814
USA
[Back to top]
Arginine Deprivation as a Targeted Therapy
for Cancer
L. Feun, M. You, C.J. Wu, M.T. Kuo, M. Wangpaichitr, S.
Spector and N. Savaraj
Certain cancers may be auxotrophic for a particular amino
acid, and amino acid deprivation is one method to treat these
tumors. Arginine deprivation is a novel approach to target
tumors which lack argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) expression.
ASS is a key enzyme which converts citrulline to arginine.
Tumors which usually do not express ASS include melanoma,
hepatocellular carcinoma, some mesotheliomas and some renal
cell cancers. Arginine can be degraded by several enzymes
including arginine deiminase (ADI). Although ADI is a microbial
enzyme from mycoplasma, it has high affinity to arginine and
catalyzes arginine to citrulline and ammonia. Citrulline can
be recycled back to arginine in normal cells which express
ASS, whereas ASS(-) tumor cells cannot. A pegylated form of
ADI (ADI-PEG20) has been formulated and has shown in vitro
and in vivo activity against melanoma and hepatocellular
carcinoma. ADI-PEG20 induces apoptosis in melanoma cell lines.
However, arginine deprivation can also induce ASS expression
in certain melanoma cell lines which can lead to in vitro
drug resistance. Phase I and II clinical trials with ADI-PEG20
have been conducted in patients with melanoma and hepatocellular
carcinoma, and antitumor activity has been demonstrated in
both cancers. This article reviews our laboratory and clinical
experience as well as that from others with ADI-PEG20 as an
antineoplastic agent. Future direction in utilizing this agent
is also discussed.
[Back to top]
Molecular Targeting Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma:
Present Strategies and Future Perspectives
S.K. Bjelogrlic, S. Radulovic and N. Babovic
Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
have been limited due to its resistance to chemotherapy and
radiotherapy. Benefits from immunotherapeutic agents provide
only a small subset of patients. During the past decade major
advances have been made toward understanding the molecular
basis of RCC development. Such acquired knowledge has offered
unique opportunities for the development of molecular targeting
agents. These agents are predominately small molecules or
monoclonal antibodies that exert their action through modulation
of protein activity or inhibition of amplified signals directly
implicated in disease mechanism. To date, some of newly molecular
targeted agents have entered advanced phases of clinical development,
received marketing authorization by regulatory agencies and
have opened a possibility of multiple treatment options. This
article overviews current knowledge in RCC molecular pathology
with recent clinical data, and discuss present strategies
for future development of targeted therapies.
[Back to top]
Design, Synthesis and Development of Novel Camptothecin
Drugs
S.T. Liew and L-X. Yang
For almost 5 decades later since it was first discovered in
1958, efforts continue to be made in the medicinal chemistry
of camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives. Thousands of CPT
analogues have been prepared. However, many of the earlier
CPT derivatives were either too toxic for clinical use or
had very poor pharmacokinetics. Efforts in the last 2 decades
were most successful and two derivatives, Irinotecan and topotecan,
have been clinically approved by the FDA. This review mainly
summarizes the design and synthesis of camptothecin drugs
in various stages of preclinical or clinical developments.
[Back to top]
Combinatorial Application of Nucleic Acid-Based Agents
Targeting Protein Kinases for Cancer Treatment
B. Spänkuch and K. Strebhardt
The progress made in cancer biology, genetics and biotechnology
has led to a major transition in cancer drug design and development,
from an emphasis on non-specific, cytotoxic agents to specific,
molecular-targeted smart cancer drugs. Many of these targeted
agents have shown to have improved selectivity for cancer
versus normal cells and are associated with better anti-tumor
efficacy and lower toxicity. The new generation of anti-cancer
drugs requires low concentrations and minimizes unwanted side
effects. Their use leads to enhanced anti-cancer effects and
to a reduction of chemotherapy resistance. Still, resistance
to common chemotherapeutic agents is a major obstacle in cancer
treatment. Silencing of cancer-relevant genes is a challenging
strategy to reduce resistance and to sensitize can-cer cells
towards anti-neoplastic agents. Resistance can be an intrinsic
problem of the tumor or can be acquired during the life time
of the tumor. A fascinating species of anti-cancer drugs include
antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) or small interfering RNAs
(siRNAs) which are able to specifically down-regulate the
expression of the target genes. The combination of nucleic
acid-based agents with anti-neoplastic drugs can induce synergistic
induction of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and reduced cell
proliferation in vitro or tumor growth in vivo.
These two strategies (ASOs and siRNAs) will help to improve
current therapeutic regimens. In addition, the combination
of targeted drugs with common chemotherapeutic agents might
be able to make resistant cells again sensitive towards a
chemotherapeutic agent.
[Back to top]
Chemosensitization of Cancer by Nitric Oxide
R. Sullivan and C.H. Graham
Recent evidence from experimental and clinical studies links
the development of intratumoral hypoxia and oxidative stress
with malignant progression. Cellular adaptation induced by
these environmental stresses is also associated with the emergence
of drug resistant populations. This adaptation is most likely
a multifactorial process involving coordination of various
stress-induced signaling pathways, including those regulated
by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and nuclear factor κB
(NF-κB)
together with their down-stream targets linked to resistance
mechanisms. Experimental data suggest that treatment of human
cancer cells with nitric oxide (NO) and NO mimetic agents
can effectively restore the sensitivity of resistant populations
to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutics both in
vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, preliminary
results from Phase II clinical trials evaluating NO as an
adjuvant to chemotherapy are promising. The present review
highlights the significance of intratumoral hypoxia and oxidative
stress in the emergence of multidrug resistance, and summarizes
the latest data demonstrating the chemosensitizing ability
of NO. To date, the specific mechanisms through which NO restores
sensitivity to anticancer agents are not clearly understood.
However, the data suggest that chemosensitization is likely
to involve NO-mediated activities associated with both prevention
and inhibition of cellular drug resistance mechanisms. Potential
mechanisms contributing to the chemosensitizing activity of
NO include vascular changes that promote increased blood delivery
and tumor oxygenation, antioxidant effects and down-regulation
of the glutathione detoxification/redox buffering system,
inhibition of key transcription factors such as HIF-1 and
NF-κB,
as well as inhibition of drug efflux transporters and DNA
repair enzymes.
[Back to top]
Novel Approaches to Deliver Gemcitabine to Cancers
L.H. Reddy and P. Couvreur
The objective of this review is to discuss the strategies
adopted to improve the delivery of gemcitabine to tumors.
Concomitant research in this area has implemented a wide variety
of approaches such as, aerosolized formulations, prodrug conjugates,
liposomes, nanoparticles and beads. Some of these strategies
were also aimed at overcoming the rapid metabolization and
drug resistance associated with gemcitabine. Aerosolized formulations
were employed to treat the local tumors, while other approaches
were aimed at the systemic therapy of cancers. The liposomal
formulations considerably increased the half-life and the
area under the curve (AUC) of gemcitabine, and simultaneously
caused a marked improvement in the anticancer activity against
experimental solid tumors developed orthotopically or at subcutaneous
site. Alternatively, the prodrug conjugates of gemcitabine
displayed considerable activity in vivo against various
tumors. Especially, in the case of leukemia in which gemcitabine
was demonstrated to be inactive, the lipidic conjugates displayed
marked efficiency following systemic and oral administration.
These conjugates induced greater apoptosis and also caused
resistance reversal in the resistant leukemia types. Altogether,
the delivery strategies adopted for gemcitabine led to a considerable
improvement in the treatment of cancers at the preclinical
stage, and some of them are potential candidates for clinical
trials.
[Back to top]
Locked Nucleic Acid Holds Promise in the Treatment
of Cancer
M. Frieden and H. Ørum
Providing novel treatments to help cancer patients live longer
and have better lives remains one of the biggest challenges
of the pharmaceutical industry. Today much is known about
the molecular and genetic causes of cancers thus facilitating
the development of novel targeted cancer drugs with improved
risk-benefit ratios compared to contemporary broadly-acting,
cytotoxic cancer drugs. Antisense therapy, e.g. the use of
single stranded oligonucleotides as therapeutic modalities,
provides the means to develop such targeted drugs, and in
recent years this concept has enjoyed a major renaissance.
Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) is a novel, third generation RNA
analogue that displays most if not all of the characteristics
required to make potent and safe antisense drugs. Here we
review the key properties of LNA oligonucleotides in the context
of their use as safe and effective antisense drugs and provide
a status on their therapeutic development in the field of
cancer.
[Back to top]
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR): A Novel
Target for Cancer Therapy
J. Stankova, A.K. Lawrance and R. Rozen
Tumor cells have an enhanced requirement for glucose, amino
acids and DNA precursors. Since folates are required for the
synthesis of thymidine and purines, the metabolism of folate
has been exploited as an anti-cancer target for over 6 decades,
with emphasis on the inhibition of DNA synthesis. However,
folate is also used to generate methionine, which is essential
for proliferation by virtue of its role in protein synthesis,
polyamine synthesis and transmethylation reactions. Tumor-derived
cell lines and human tumor xenografts have been shown to be
methionine dependent i.e., they are unable to survive
without methionine and are unable to efficiently utilize homocysteine,
the immediate metabolic precursor of methionine. Since non-transformed
cells are methionine-independent, the targeting of methionine
metabolism presents an opportunity to selectively disrupt
the unique metabolic networks in cancer cells.
This chapter provides an overview of the critical role of
folate and methionine metabolism in tumor cells and summarizes
the current anti-folate and anti-methionine strategies to
inhibit growth of transformed lines and tumors. We also present
our work on the development of a novel anti-cancer target,
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a key enzyme
of both folate and methionine metabolism. Our data demonstrate
that antisense-mediated inhibition of MTHFR is associated
with increased cytotoxicity in vitro and with decreased
growth of tumors in vivo. These findings warrant
further investigation of this enzyme and the methionine biosynthetic
pathway in exploring new strategies for cancer chemotherapy.
|