Current
Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
ISSN: 1568-0266

Current Topics
in Medicinal Chemistry
Volume 7, Number 2, 2007
Contents
Adrenoceptors as Targets in Drug Discovery:
Medicinal Chemistry and Therapeutical Potential
Guest Editors: Professors Maria Pigini and Wilma
Quaglia

Editorial Pp. 127
Subclassification and Nomenclature
of α-
and β-Adrenoceptors
Pp. 129-134
J. Paul Hieble
[Abstract]
Recent Advances in the Discovery of α1-Adrenoceptor
Agonists Pp. 135-145
Michael J. Bishop
[Abstract]
Recent Advances in α1-Adrenoreceptor
Antagonists as Pharmacological Tools and Therapeutic Agents
Pp. 147-162
Michela Rosini, Maria L. Bolognesi, Dario Giardinà,
Anna Minarini, Vincenzo Tumiatti and Carlo Melchiorre
[Abstract]
Agonists and Antagonists Targeting the Different α2
Adrenoceptor Subtypes Pp. 163-186
Francesco Gentili, Maria Pigini, Alessandro Piergentili
and Mario Giannella
[Abstract]
Interest of α2-Adrenergic
Agonists and Antagonists in Clinical Practice: Background,
Facts and Perspectives Pp. 187-194
Pierre-Antoine Crassous, Colette Denis, Hervé Paris
and Jean Michel Sénard
[Abstract]
The In Silico Insights of α-Adrenergic
Receptors Over the Last Decade: Methodological Approaches
and Structural Features of the 3D Models Pp. 195-205
Antonio Carrieri and Alessandra Fano
[Abstract]
Recent Advances in Identification and Characterization
of β
Adrenoceptor Agonists and Antagonists Pp. 207-210
J. Paul Hieble
[Abstract]
Genetic Variation of Human Adrenergic Receptors: From
Molecular and Functional Properties to Clinical and Pharmacogenetic
Implications Pp. 217-231
Stéphane Schaak, Jeanne Mialet-Perez, Christodoulos
Flordellis and Hervé Paris
[Abstract]
Abstracts
[Back to top]
Editorial
Adrenoceptors continue to represent important and innovative
pharmacological targets, even though their discovery dates
back to more than 100 years ago: in fact, in 1905 Langley
postulated that adrenaline exerted its action by interacting
with “receptive substances” [Langley, J. N. J.
Physiol. (London) 1905, 33,
374-413]; since then numerous studies have been carried out.
The first distinction between α
and β
receptors was postulated in 1948 by Ahlquist, who, however,
in 1973 still had doubts on their effective existence, such
a differentiation being defined “….an abstract
concept conceived to explain observed responses of tissues
produced by chemicals of various structure” [Ahlquist,
R. P. Adrenergic Receptors: a Personal and Practical View.
Perspect. Biol. Med. 1973, 17,
119-122].
Since then, radioligand binding studies, second messenger
assays and molecular biology techniques have led to the identification
of nine different subtypes, which, however, do not seem to
explain fully all the experimental observations. Even if it
is difficult to postulate the existence of other members of
this superfamily (however, at the same time most attention
has been devoted to two possible candidates, the α1L
and β4),
the improvement in the selectivity of interaction and, therefore,
in the quality of response is explained through the recognition
of different affinity states or non-canonical receptor sites.
In this issue, after a review of the subclassification of
the α-
and β-adrenoceptors
by Hieble, the recent advances in the discovery of α1-agonists
and antagonists are highlighted by Bishop and Melchiorre et
al., respectively. Agonists and antagonists directed
to α2-adrenoceptors
and their clinical utility are described by Giannella et
al. and Crassous et al., respectively. Carrieri
and Fano examine the methodological approaches and structural
features of the 3D models in α-adrenoceptor
characterization, and Hieble gives an overview of β-adrenoceptor
ligands and their therapeutic uses. Finally, Schaak et
al. focus on possible genetic variations of human adrenoceptors.
The therapeutic applications of adrenergic ligands are various:
for example, the primary indications of the α1-agonists
are in nasal congestion, otitis and in stress urinary incontinence;
agonists, acting at the α2-adrenoceptors,
are extremely valuable adjuncts to anesthetics and analgesics;
those at the β2-adrenoceptors
are used as bronchodilators, whereas β3-agonists
prove to be efficacious in the treatment of overactive bladder.
The use of the β1/β2-antagonists
as antihypertensives, α1-antagonists
in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and α2-antagonists
in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is well established.
A better knowledge of the structural differences of the various
receptor species, in particular within each of the three distinct
classes, and of the possible aggregation of such proteins
in homo- and heterodimer forms will help to design new ligands
that, being more selective, will have new and safer therapeutic
uses.
Maria Pigini & Wilma Quaglia
Department of Chemical Sciences
University of Camerino
Via S. Agostino, 1
62032 – Camerino
Italy
[Back to top]
Subclassification and Nomenclature of α-
and β-Adrenoceptors
J. Paul Hieble
The subclassification of α
- and β-adrenoceptors
has resulted in many opportunities for drug discovery. Important
adrenoceptor targets include β2-agonists
as bronchodilators, β1
or β1/β2
antagonists as antihypertensives, centrally acting α2-agonists
for a variety of applications and α1-antagonists
for hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. The pharmacology
and nomenclature of 9 adrenoceptors is now established, with
α1,
α2
and β-adrenoceptors
being divided into three subtypes each. It is unlikely that
additional discrete adrenoceptor sequences will be identified;
however the presence of “affinity states” can
give rise to tissue specific differences in pharmacology for
a specific subtype. Polymorphisms and splice variants of adrenoceptors
continue to be identified; in some cases these modifications
can affect pharmacological characteristics and could influence
the efficacy of adrenoceptor-targeted therapy.
Selective antagonists are now available of all 9 adrenoceptor
subtypes. Although these will not all have therapeutic application,
the availability of improved pharmacologic tools could lead
to the identification of new adrenoceptor targets.
[Back to top]
Recent Advances in the Discovery of α1-Adrenoceptor
Agonists
Michael J. Bishop
The α1
adrenoceptors are three of nine well-characterized receptors
that are activated by epinephrine and norepinephrine. Agonists
acting at the α1
adrenoceptors produce numerous physiological effects, and
are used therapeutically for several indications. Many known
α1
adrenoceptor agonists are α1A
selective, but the discovery of highly selective α1B
and α1D
adrenoceptor agonists has proven to be an extremely difficult
goal to achieve. This review will focus on recent advances
in the discovery, development and clinical utility of subtype-specific
α1
agonists as well as contributions to our understanding of
agonist-receptor interactions.
[Back to top]
Recent Advances in α1-Adrenoreceptor
Antagonists as Pharmacological Tools and Therapeutic Agents
Michela Rosini, Maria L. Bolognesi, Dario Giardinà,
Anna Minarini, Vincenzo Tumiatti and Carlo Melchiorre
Native α1-adrenoreceptors
(ARs) appear to exist as three different subtypes encoded
by three genes, α1A/1a,
α1B/1b,
and α1D/1d
Historically, the discovery of agents selective for each of
the three α1-AR
subtypes has been an active area of medicinal chemistry research
because of the wide number of possible therapeutic applications.
Initially introduced for the management of hypertension, α1-AR
antagonists have, in fact, become increasingly common in the
treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and are effective
therapeutic tools, when characterized by an appropriate uroselective
profile. The majority of these derivatives display a competitive
mechanism of action and belong to a variety of structural
classes, but this review is focused on compounds belonging
to the quinazoline, benzodioxane, arylpiperazine, and 1,4-dihydropyridine
classes.
[Back to top]
Agonists and Antagonists Targeting the Different α2
Adrenoceptor Subtypes
Francesco Gentili, Maria Pigini, Alessandro Piergentili
and Mario Giannella
Chemical and biological strategies have provided evidence
for α2-receptor
heterogeneity, to date classified in three different subtypes,
α2A,
α2B,
and α2C.
These are widely distributed throughout the body and mediate
numerous effects; therefore, the potential therapeutic indications
of agonists and antagonists are numerous. Nevertheless, the
lack of subtype-selectivity of the well-known compounds represents
a major limit for their use. SAR studies may help to design
new and more selective drugs.
[Back to top]
Interest of α2-Adrenergic
Agonists and Antagonists in Clinical Practice: Background,
Facts and Perspectives
Pierre-Antoine Crassous, Colette Denis, Hervé Paris
and Jean Michel Sénard
The family of α2-adrenergic
receptors (α2-ARs)
comprises three subtypes which are each endowed with specific
functions. α2-agonists
and α2-antagonists
are part of the clinician armamentarium since several decades;
however, none of the compounds so far available is subtype
selective. For long, clonidine and yohimbine have been used
for the treatment of hypertension and impotence respectively,
but both have been superseded by newer drugs. This review
attempts, by a comprehensive analysis of the literature, to
cover the present clinical use and the potential therapeutic
interest of α2-agonists
or antagonists. From the clinical data, it is concluded that,
with the exception of a few particular situations, α2-agonists
are only of limited utility as a monotherapy. By contrast,
they offer several powerful advantages when used in adjunctive
therapy. In perioperative settings, α2-agonists
are extremely valuable adjuncts to anesthetics and analgesics
for the induction of anxiolysis, maintenance of sedation,
management of pain and prevention of shivering. In the ophthalmic
clinic, they are used to lower intra-ocular pressure during
laser surgery of the eye. As a daily medication, α2-agonists
are also of interest for the treatment of glaucoma, muscle
spasticity, opiate withdrawal, and behavior disorders. The
α2-antagonists
are useful antidotes for reversing the threatening effects
of agonist overdose, but currently there are very few indications.
New applications are under investigation, and new molecules
with more refined subtype-selectivity may emerge, so the clinical
utility of both α2-agonists
and antagonists will undoubtedly expand in the future.
[Back to top]
The In Silico Insights of α-Adrenergic
Receptors Over the Last Decade: Methodological Approaches
and Structural Features of the 3D Models
Antonio Carrieri and Alessandra Fano
Homology modeling has been widely used in the latest years
in order to overcome the lackness of adequate structural information.
This technique has also been successfully applied in the very
difficult but challenging field of G-protein coupled receptors
where the need of three-dimensional insight is significantly
more essential. Here we will review the latest advancements
in this topic taking as case studies α−adrenergic
receptors theoretical models and their structural features.
[Back to top]
Recent Advances in Identification and Characterization
of β
Adrenoceptor Agonists and Antagonists
J. Paul Hieble
The three β-adrenoceptor
subtypes (β1,
β2,
β3)
represent important therapeutic targets. The use of β2-adrenoceptor
agonists as bronchodilators and β1
or β1/β2
antagonists as antihypertensives is well established; research
is ongoing in these areas to refine pharmacodynamic properties.
It is also feasible to design molecules combining β-adrenoceptor
affinity with other pharmacophores. This is facilitated by
the ability to confer β-adrenoceptor
antagonist activity via attachment of a phenylethanolamine
moiety or to incorporate diverse structural elements in the
N-alkyl substituent of a β-adrenoceptor
agonist or antagonist. β3-Adrenoceptor
agonists have not yet been successfully developed as drugs
for any therapeutic indication; nevertheless, during the past
few years many highly potent and selective β3-agonists
have been reported, some with good oral bioavailability. Selective
β3-adrenoceptor
antagonists have also been identified; useful pharmacological
tools are now available for the evaluation of the functional
role of each β-adrenoceptor
subtype.
[Back to top]
Genetic Variation of Human Adrenergic Receptors: From
Molecular and Functional Properties to Clinical and Pharmacogenetic
Implications
Stéphane Schaak, Jeanne Mialet-Perez, Christodoulos
Flordellis and Hervé Paris
Adrenergic receptors (ARs) are directly or indirectly involved
in the control of a large panel of physiological functions
and are the targets of drugs for the treatment of several
common diseases including congestive heart failure, asthma
or benign prostatic hyperplasia. The genotyping of human populations
with diverse ethnicity has revealed that the genes encoding
α1A-,
α1B-,
α2A-,
α2B-,
α2C-,
β1-,
β2-
and β3-AR
are polymorphic in their coding region as well as in their
regulatory domains and non-coding regions. The functional
consequences of these genetic variations include changes in
expression at transcriptional or translational level, modification
of coupling to heterotrimeric G-proteins resulting in a gain
or a loss in function, and alteration of GRK-mediated receptor
phosphorylation/desensitization or of agonist-promoted down-regulation.
None of the mutations identified so far is per se
a major risk factor for acquired or inherited disease; however,
variants of α2C-AR
and β1-AR
may act in synergy to determine the progression of heart failure
and certain combinations of polymorphisms on β2-AR
correlate with asthmatic phenotypes or response to β2-agonist
therapy. Herein we summarize the present knowledge on AR gene
polymorphisms, and discuss the putative consequences of variations
resulting in receptor malfunction on pharmacogenomics and
disease predisposition.
|